LULU Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Ford Motor has a net margin of 13.27% compared to Lululemon Athletica's net margin of 1.16%. Lululemon Athletica's return on equity of 43.35% beat Ford Motor's return on equity of 11.39%.

Lululemon Athletica has a consensus price target of $301.63, signalling upside risk potential of 33.72%. On the other hand Ford Motor has an analysts' consensus of $10.37 which suggests that it could fall by -3.52%. Given that Lululemon Athletica has higher upside potential than Ford Motor, analysts believe Lululemon Athletica is more attractive than Ford Motor.

Lululemon Athletica has a beta of 1.260, which suggesting that the stock is 26.042% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Ford Motor has a beta of 1.498, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 49.843%.

Lululemon Athletica has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Ford Motor offers a yield of 6.98% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share. Lululemon Athletica pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Ford Motor pays out 53.04% of its earnings as a dividend. Ford Motor's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Lululemon Athletica quarterly revenues are $2.4B, which are smaller than Ford Motor quarterly revenues of $40.7B. Lululemon Athletica's net income of $314.6M is lower than Ford Motor's net income of $471M. Notably, Lululemon Athletica's price-to-earnings ratio is 15.28x while Ford Motor's PE ratio is 8.60x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lululemon Athletica is 2.57x versus 0.24x for Ford Motor. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

General Motors has a net margin of 13.27% compared to Lululemon Athletica's net margin of 6.32%. Lululemon Athletica's return on equity of 43.35% beat General Motors's return on equity of 8.33%.

Lululemon Athletica has a consensus price target of $301.63, signalling upside risk potential of 33.72%. On the other hand General Motors has an analysts' consensus of $54.15 which suggests that it could grow by 11.61%. Given that Lululemon Athletica has higher upside potential than General Motors, analysts believe Lululemon Athletica is more attractive than General Motors.

Lululemon Athletica has a beta of 1.260, which suggesting that the stock is 26.042% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison General Motors has a beta of 1.340, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 34.003%.

Lululemon Athletica has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. General Motors offers a yield of 1.05% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share. Lululemon Athletica pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. General Motors pays out 10.87% of its earnings as a dividend. General Motors's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Lululemon Athletica quarterly revenues are $2.4B, which are smaller than General Motors quarterly revenues of $44B. Lululemon Athletica's net income of $314.6M is lower than General Motors's net income of $2.8B. Notably, Lululemon Athletica's price-to-earnings ratio is 15.28x while General Motors's PE ratio is 6.76x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lululemon Athletica is 2.57x versus 0.28x for General Motors. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Tesla has a net margin of 13.27% compared to Lululemon Athletica's net margin of 2.12%. Lululemon Athletica's return on equity of 43.35% beat Tesla's return on equity of 9.1%.

Lululemon Athletica has a consensus price target of $301.63, signalling upside risk potential of 33.72%. On the other hand Tesla has an analysts' consensus of $301.97 which suggests that it could fall by -6.46%. Given that Lululemon Athletica has higher upside potential than Tesla, analysts believe Lululemon Athletica is more attractive than Tesla.

Lululemon Athletica has a beta of 1.260, which suggesting that the stock is 26.042% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Tesla has a beta of 2.468, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 146.818%.

Lululemon Athletica has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Tesla offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Lululemon Athletica pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Tesla pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Lululemon Athletica quarterly revenues are $2.4B, which are smaller than Tesla quarterly revenues of $19.3B. Lululemon Athletica's net income of $314.6M is lower than Tesla's net income of $409M. Notably, Lululemon Athletica's price-to-earnings ratio is 15.28x while Tesla's PE ratio is 177.01x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lululemon Athletica is 2.57x versus 11.80x for Tesla. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Vision Marine Technologies has a net margin of 13.27% compared to Lululemon Athletica's net margin of -3425.21%. Lululemon Athletica's return on equity of 43.35% beat Vision Marine Technologies's return on equity of -131.17%.

Lululemon Athletica has a consensus price target of $301.63, signalling upside risk potential of 33.72%. On the other hand Vision Marine Technologies has an analysts' consensus of $11.01 which suggests that it could grow by 40.6%. Given that Vision Marine Technologies has higher upside potential than Lululemon Athletica, analysts believe Vision Marine Technologies is more attractive than Lululemon Athletica.

Lululemon Athletica has a beta of 1.260, which suggesting that the stock is 26.042% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Vision Marine Technologies has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Lululemon Athletica has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Vision Marine Technologies offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Lululemon Athletica pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Vision Marine Technologies pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Lululemon Athletica quarterly revenues are $2.4B, which are larger than Vision Marine Technologies quarterly revenues of $73.3K. Lululemon Athletica's net income of $314.6M is higher than Vision Marine Technologies's net income of -$2.5M. Notably, Lululemon Athletica's price-to-earnings ratio is 15.28x while Vision Marine Technologies's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lululemon Athletica is 2.57x versus 0.19x for Vision Marine Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.